My main concern with venividicogniti is the mode of thinking than the specific of this article. He seems to demand such fealty to Prodhon’s writing that anything that even seems to disagree is deviant, blasphemous and contrary to orthodoxy.

It is the same dogmatic thinking that the Soviet Marxists did, ironically, with regard to Darwin. Since Darwin did not agree with Marxian interpretations of things, they choose to believe in Lamarkian evolution. The result was the millions starved because the once prosperous Ukraine wheat fields grew nothing (because they choose to use those ideas rather than real science when it came to planting, growing and creating strands of wheat).

Worse, he completely misunderstands Prodhon.